What if the moment you've been chasing in your Senior Developer career isn't "more code" – but a very different definition of what it means to be senior?
After 5 years in a Senior Dev Role on Salesforce, many developers hit the same wall: the day-to-day looks less like a Traditional SWE (Software Engineer) job and more like a blend of project management tasks, business analysis, and coordination work:
- Helping run discoveries
- Doing requirements gathering
- Writing tickets for others to implement
- Producing documentation for stakeholders
Meanwhile, what you really want your developer responsibilities to look like is simple:
- Code development
- Deep software development problems
- Modern engineering practices and system design
So what's happening here?
You're discovering the quiet truth of many Senior Developer roles in the Salesforce ecosystem: seniority often pulls you away from the editor and toward the meeting room. Your value gets defined by how well you translate business needs, orchestrate work, and keep stakeholders aligned – not by how much you ship as an individual contributor.
In other words, the default Salesforce career path often nudges a Senior Dev Role toward "mini product owner" instead of "principal Software Engineer (SWE)."
That raises some uncomfortable but important questions for your career progression:
- Do you want to grow as a technical leader or as an execution coordinator?
- Are you optimizing for job roles that reward systems thinking and engineering practices, or those that reward process fluency and governance?
- Is your current environment structurally designed to give senior people coding time – or to consume them with ticket writing and sign-offs?
For many, the answer is: it depends heavily on where you sit.
In some Salesforce orgs, especially consulting environments, seniority naturally drifts toward client-facing work, requirements gathering, and technical documentation. You become the person who "knows everything" – which often means you're also the person who writes everything except the code.
By contrast, teams that operate more like internal engineering groups or product-led teams at larger ISV firms (Independent Software Vendor firms) tend to define Senior Developer and Senior SWE roles differently. There, senior people are still expected to:
- Own complex software development problems end-to-end
- Drive architecture and engineering practices
- Lead design reviews and code reviews
- Spend significant time in code/coding, not just in documents
So if you want your Salesforce career to look more like a traditional SWE path, the central shift is less about "getting a better title" and more about choosing the right operating model:
- Environments where internal engineering is treated as a product organization
- ISV firms where Salesforce is the platform, not the project
- Teams where developer responsibilities explicitly include architecture, performance, and developer experience – not just delivery of business requests
The deeper idea worth sharing with other senior professionals is this:
The biggest fork in your Senior Developer career is not Salesforce vs non-Salesforce, but builder of systems vs manager of process.
Both are valid, high-impact paths. The risk is drifting into one by accident.
If you're feeling that tension between "what your Senior Dev Role is" and "what you thought a Software Engineer would be doing," that's your signal to step back and ask:
- What proportion of my week is code development vs. documentation, discoveries, and ticket writing?
- Do I want to be evaluated on lines of code, or on how effectively I shape job roles, systems, and teams?
- Am I in the right kind of Salesforce organization to become the engineer I want to be in the next 5–10 years?
Sometimes the most senior move you can make is not another promotion, but a deliberate shift into a context where the definition of "senior" finally matches how you want to build.
For developers looking to enhance their technical skills while navigating these career decisions, mastering platform-specific development languages can provide the deep technical foundation needed for either path. Whether you choose to become a systems architect or a process coordinator, understanding the underlying technology stack remains crucial.
Additionally, if you're considering the ISV route, exploring Zoho Projects can give you insight into how product-led organizations structure their development workflows, helping you understand what "engineering as a product" actually looks like in practice.
The key is recognizing that both paths – technical leadership and execution coordination – require different skill sets and offer different rewards. Understanding the strategic implications of each choice can help you make a more informed decision about which direction aligns with your long-term career goals.
For those leaning toward the technical leadership path, consider how modern development practices are evolving. Zoho Flow represents the kind of low-code/no-code integration platform that's changing how senior developers approach system architecture – requiring both deep technical understanding and strategic thinking about business processes.
Ultimately, the choice between being a "builder of systems" and a "manager of process" isn't just about preference – it's about understanding which environment will let you grow in the direction that energizes you most.
Why does seniority on Salesforce often pull me away from coding?
Many Salesforce senior roles sit inside delivery- or client-focused organizations where value is measured by requirement translation, stakeholder alignment, and risk control. As a result, seniors are asked to run discoveries, write tickets, and produce documentation rather than spend long blocks of time solving deep engineering problems. Understanding technical leadership frameworks can help navigate these organizational dynamics.
Is this drift inevitable or can I stay hands-on as a senior engineer?
It's not inevitable — it depends on the operating model. Internal engineering teams and product-led ISVs typically keep senior ICs focused on architecture, system design, code ownership, and engineering practices. To stay hands-on you often need to join or create environments that treat engineering as product work rather than professional services. Zoho Projects offers excellent project management capabilities for engineering teams focused on technical delivery.
How can I tell which path my current role is pushing me toward?
Track your week: measure time in coding vs. meetings, documentation, and ticketing. Look at promotion criteria—are seniors rewarded for shipping complex technical work or for managing client expectations and process? Also examine org structure: do engineers report into product/engineering or into delivery/consulting? Understanding organizational structures can provide clarity on career trajectory expectations.
What questions should I ask at interviews to find a role that preserves engineering work?
Ask about: how much time senior ICs spend coding, ownership of architecture, expectations for code reviews and design leadership, presence of product managers, engineering KPIs, and whether the team follows modern engineering practices (CI/CD, automated tests, architecture reviews). Customer success frameworks can also help you understand how technical roles interface with client-facing responsibilities.
If I want to shift toward a traditional SWE career, what kinds of companies or teams should I target?
Target product-led companies and ISVs where Salesforce is a platform for a product (not a client project), internal engineering organizations inside larger firms, and teams that explicitly list architecture, developer experience, and performance as senior responsibilities. Consider exploring Zoho Creator for building custom applications that demonstrate your technical capabilities.
What skills should I build to be competitive for a technical leadership/Principal SWE path?
Invest in system design, architecture, performance optimization, platform-specific depth (e.g., Apex, Lightning, or other platform languages), testing & CI/CD, observability, and mentoring for code quality. Demonstrable ownership of end-to-end technical projects is key. Platform-specific programming guides can help deepen your technical expertise in low-code environments.
How can I change my current role to include more coding time?
Propose a role redefinition with measurable outcomes: allocate dedicated deep-work days, take ownership of a technical area (architecture, CI/CD, dev experience), delegate or rotate discovery and ticketing tasks, and request promotion criteria that include technical delivery metrics. Zoho Flow can help automate routine tasks, freeing up time for more technical work.
What trade-offs exist between becoming a technical leader versus a manager of process?
Technical leadership emphasizes systems thinking, deep problem solving, and long-term technical impact; it often rewards technical depth and product outcomes. Manager-of-process roles reward stakeholder management, delivery predictability, and governance. Both can be high-impact but require different daily work and KPIs. Understanding different career frameworks can help you make informed decisions about your professional path.
Are platform tools and low-code trends a threat to staying technical?
Low-code/automation shifts the shape of problems but increases the need for strong system design, integration strategy, and developer experience. Senior engineers who understand platform internals and orchestration (APIs, performance, security) remain highly valuable. Platform expertise guides can help you stay current with evolving technical landscapes.
How should I evaluate a potential employer's engineering maturity?
Look for signs like dedicated architecture reviews, automated testing and CI/CD, documented standards and design patterns, investment in developer tooling, clear career ladders for ICs, and product-team structures with engineers owning technical outcomes. Development best practices resources can help you assess technical maturity during interviews.
If I enjoy both technical work and client-facing coordination, how can I balance them?
Define a split role with protected deep-work time and a clear handoff process for client coordination (rotate discovery responsibilities, use senior leads for high-level stakeholder work, and keep implementation ownership for engineering-focused tasks). Zoho CRM can help manage client relationships efficiently while preserving technical focus time.
What practical first steps can I take this quarter to move toward the builder-of-systems path?
1) Audit your weekly time and document the percentage spent coding. 2) Volunteer to own a non-trivial technical area (performance, APIs, CI/CD). 3) Build a portfolio of architecture/design docs and shipped features. 4) Start interviewing with product-led teams to benchmark expectations. Understanding product strategy can help you identify the right opportunities.
Are there resources that help deepen platform-specific skills while I make career decisions?
Yes — invest in deep platform guides, language-specific mastery (e.g., Apex or Deluge), system design study, and hands-on projects. These build credibility for both technical leadership and complex delivery roles and make it easier to pivot into ISV or product engineering teams. Platform integration resources and programming language guides can accelerate your technical skill development.
No comments:
Post a Comment